Problem Link:Difficulty:Easy Prerequisites:Dynamic Programming Problem:A WString is defined as a string consisting of lowercase alphabets, and exactly 3 "#"s that divide the string into 4 nonempty contiguous parts, where each part consists of the same alphabet. Given a string S, find the length of the longest WString that is a subsequence of S, with the added constraint that the three chosen #positions in W, are consecutive #positions in S. Explanation:Let us suppose that we choose our three #positions as P1, P2 and P3. After fixing P1, P2, P3, we greedily choose the most frequent character from [0, P11], [P1+1, P21], [P2+1, P31], [P3+1, N1]. We further should disregard cases when any one of the above yields an "empty" string. Let cnt[i][k] = Number of times character k occurs in S[0...i]. Then, given P1, P2, P3, we just need to calculate Precomputing values of cnt[i][k] will take time O(N * 26). Further, we can iterate over all consecutive P1,P2,P3 in O(N) time, and each will lead to a calculation of 26 time. Thus overall complexity will be O(N * 26 * T). This can be sped up by a constant factor by precomputing MaxLeft(i) and MaxRight(i) which will find the maximum frequency of a single letter to the left or to the right of position i respectively. Setter's Solution:Can be found here Tester's Solution:Can be found here
This question is marked "community wiki".
asked 17 Jun '13, 15:33

For people who are asking why there code was wrong, you have the working codes now. Write code for creating random and heavy test cases and compare the output of your code and working code. It will be very easy to find error in this way rather than asking other people to read your complete code and point out the error. answered 17 Jun '13, 21:48

The Problem Could be made really very nice if you just remove this condition " there must not be any '#' symbols between the positions of the first and the second '#' symbol he chooses, nor between the second and the third ", otherwise the problem is simply a piece of cake. answered 17 Jun '13, 22:13
4
It would not only become really nice, but also really hard :P Who knows, maybe it'll appear in future as a challenge question!
(18 Jun '13, 01:33)
Actually ,when I read the problem statement for the first time, i do skipped that condition and coded the whole logic but then saw that it was not working for the third case.Wasted about 3 hours :'(
(18 Jun '13, 14:35)
1
Third sample case was put there to drive home the condition. If it weren't there, I expect we'd've got a LOT of "Why is my code giving WA" comments during the contest :)
(19 Jun '13, 01:27)
@devuy11 Had the same problem, I even misread it twice, when it appeared to be a lot simpler. Really need to focus more on constraints next time. @pragrame It sure is harder to find, but my code, which I think would be correct without the constraint, still is pretty short(even shorter than what I submitted with the constraint) and very doable for most of the people who solved this problem by theirselfs I guess.
(20 Jun '13, 03:08)

@pragrame ur editorials are awesome.. In MAY13 cookoff where almost all problems were of dynamic programming and bitwise operators the explanation given by you were superb. Keep posting us these editorials.. :):) answered 17 Jun '13, 23:57
Thanks :) Its great to have this feedback. I personally am a fan of @anton_lunyov, who has mastered setting, testing, and editorialwriting.
(18 Jun '13, 01:36)

plz tell me where i can reduce steps to reduce my time complexity,... answered 17 Jun '13, 15:42
1
You are calculating same thing again and again. What you are doing is going through the entire string again and again h number of times where h is the number of "#" so that makes your algo O(hn) where n is length of string in worst cast n = 10000, h=10000 so clearly your code won't run in the specified time limit. What you could have done is you could have stored the character frequency in each possible range when you were reading the input in O(n). And then calculate the frequency in each possible range in O(26). Here's my solution : http://www.codechef.com/viewsolution/2235754
(18 Jun '13, 19:00)

please tell why am i getting wrong answer.. answered 17 Jun '13, 16:04

@satya8081 >> This was the most common misconception during the contest. a#b#c#d#e is NOT a W string, but a#b#c#d is a W string. The string given by Ryuk answered 17 Jun '13, 17:46
that means for test case a#b#c#d#e, answer would be 7(I'm still confused)
(20 Jun '13, 01:24)
Yes, why don't you copy someone's AC solution and check for some selfgenerated tests to avoid your confusion.
(20 Jun '13, 15:46)

http://www.codechef.com/viewsolution/2281355 can anyone tell why i am gettin WA :( answered 20 Jun '13, 07:37

Someone please help me out in figuring why I got WA for this: http://ideone.com/7y3jvr answered 21 Jun '13, 22:34
@r20rock the output for this test case 1 uuu#####yyy#yyy#yyy#########uuu must be 15 whereas your code returns 0. Read the problem statement more carefully.
(21 Jun '13, 23:05)

Hi, Apologies for opening an old thread but i really liked the question and have been trying to get this one. My code is constantly getting WA for this question. I have tried the examples given along with some testcases mentioned in the comments, but their answer is coming fine. http://www.codechef.com/viewsolution/3799371 Can someone please take a look and give any inputs he may want to share? It would be really helpful for me. Thanks answered 28 Apr '14, 23:51

The setter's and tester's solution links seem to be broken.
@admin why not you show at which case the answer is wrong or exceeding time limit or other case ... after the contest is over.. I think this should not have any problem and I believe it will be good for a programmer like me having little bit error many times...and had to think everything in a new way...
@nihalpi1, solution links do tend to be broken at the initial point of uploading Editorials. The general aim is to roll out the Editorial as soon as possible after the contest. The Setter and Tester links will work in a day or two.
Adding to @unlimited700 's answer . In Hackerrank , the feature is available , showing for which test case , the solution fails.
@unlimited700, @tutulive  Is showing testcases for practice problems helpful or not is highly debatable. Without test cases you are forced to think of boundary conditions/cases which probably you won't if you see them. It will prove helpful in the long run specially if you practice on SPOJ.