PROBLEM LINK:Author: Misha Chorniy DIFFICULTY:Simple PREREQUISITES:None PROBLEM:Given an array, we have to report the number of subarrays such that the product of all numbers in that subarray is equal to the sum of all numbers in that subarray. EXPLANATION:The problem is very direct given the size of the input array. Since $n \leq$ 50, we can directly iterate over the subarrays and calculate product and sum. The editorialist's solution is very clear in describing the approach. Below is the pseudocode of the same:
COMPLEXITY:$\mathcal{O}(n^2)$ per test case. SAMPLE SOLUTIONS:
This question is marked "community wiki".
asked 16 Dec '15, 14:51

Actually. Since there can't be too many numbers greater than 1 in any such subarray (since the product grows exponentially, $O(\log{sum})$ at most), you can store just the numbers greater than 1 in another array and try all their subarrays  there are $O(N\log{sum})$ of them. For each such subarray, you know the product, which the ignored 1s don't change; this subarray corresponds to subarrays $[a,b]$ in the original array, where $a$ and $b$ must be in some, disjoint, ranges (only up to the first integer $> 1$ to the left/right); the sum is a linear function of $ba$ and since it has to be equal to the product, any $a$ for which we have a valid $b$ gives one of the counted subarrays; we just need to find the range of such $a$s. For a given subarray of integers $> 1$, everything can be implemented in $O(1)$, so we have $O(N\log{sum})$ time complexity. answered 21 Dec '15, 02:17

I did the same way and got correct answer. But what if n would have been a large number? What is a faster(in terms of time complexity) way to do it ? answered 21 Dec '15, 00:28

Good question, I think in this problem nothing faster than O(n^2). If someone has something better, I will glad to hear it. answered 21 Dec '15, 01:14

How to solve the same problem for larger numbers and strict time limit!!! answered 27 Dec '15, 00:00

I have submitted the sol. but m getting a nzec. I am using string.split("\s+"). Any suggestions ? answered 18 Feb '16, 20:19

Pardon me if i am missing something elementary, but wouldn't this fail with an inputs such as [2,3,2]? This algo will not be able to generate 2,2 as a possible option and will return the result as 3. The result should be 4. [2], [3],[2],[2,2] answered 20 Mar '16, 16:52

Pasting a reply from Stackoverflow about what is a subarray "I think the subarray means the array in which the contiguousness is based on the index . for example lets take an example 2 3 1 3 1 (index are 0,1,2,3,4 respectively ) so subarray is 2,3,1 3 (index 0,1,2,3) But (1,2 1) (index 2,0,4) cannot be a subarray coz the indexes are noncontiguous .." Your example [2, 3 ,2] The [2, 2] array has indexes 0, 2 which are noncontiguous. Therefore, it can't be an option for subarray answered 25 Mar '16, 20:10

this editorial isn't completely correct,what if some random number position elements yield such type of subarray for ex like a[o],a[3],a[9].this case i not incuded in the editorial answered 22 Nov '16, 23:58
