We just now talked to the contest Director Dr P.K Biswas . He told us to mail the ACM ASIA Contest director Dr C J Hwang cjhwang88@gmail.com regarding the matter. So kindly mail all the queries regarding the results to Dr C J Hwang and hopefully they may get resolved .
I just want to know -“will there be any changes in final list”?
If no, i don’t know what to say.
If yes, please take the necessary steps and announce the final list as soon as possible
Did any of the concerned teams get any response from the IIT-KGP officials. We sent a mail to them , but there has not been any response so far. If anyone has any info please do notify asap
Dude i totally bear with you,but in the end you have to understand that the problem setter’s are random people with NULL knowledge of programming competitions.They give us exact problem implementation and expect us to write codes from scratch when little delay can cost you your seat .The fact that none of the questions in regionals or finals are direct implementations calls for a plagiarism check.I really want to know who the problem setter was and congratulate him on screwing the aspirations of some good deserving candidates.We also have to cancel our tickets now.
What I believed till now was that ACM ICPC is all about knowing and applying algorithms (as they allowed us to have our standard libraries with us during the onsite also) but they have proved me wrong by their gesture of removing the deserving teams. It only conveys us that they only care about rote learning of some 1000 lines standard code and not how they are applied .
@tusharmakkar08, just for the sake that you mentioned that standard libraries/algorithms that are implemented or adapted from some third party source is officially allowed by ACM-ICPC, but my teammates who went to ACM-ICPC Kanpur Onsite Round 2012 had to face a different scenario. Access to C++ STL and carrying standard algorithm implementations ‘were not’ allowed in the onsite round. All teams were taken aback and the contest director reasoned that carrying 25-page implementation is wastage of pages and thus the environment.
@tusharmakkar08, please post the outcome of discussion with the ACM ASIA Contest director Dr C J Hwang, particularly, the usage of third party code that is wriiten and published/distributed before the start of the round.
@aj5774 : I don’t know about ACM-ICPC Kanpur but people were allowed to carry standard algorithm implementation in ACM-ICPC Amritapuri . This year cookbook also mentions the same .
Same here. We also got selected. Thanks a lot guys. I guess the unity which we all showed finally paid rich dividends. Thanks to everyone especially ICPC Asia for helping us out