It’s already almost two weeks and there is no announcement about the results from any of the regionals. Why acm icpc being such a huge contest and there is not at all any information from the source.
we almost solved 2nd just missed out a corner case.
i am waiting for 3rd nov pre elimination to see what they do.i will do good in that.once i used to do pretty good in codechefchallenges.They took my 1950 rating from my previous account without listening to me.
and see there are almost 1000 slots for regionals in india,ask the remaining teams the same question “are they deserving?”.
thanks for your advice/concern/comment.
proved myself not a robot just to see ranklist.what bullshit website
3 Likes
I am also waiting for Snackdown pre-elimination round. 
And no matter what you say, Codechef admins won’t do anything regarding this ACM-ICPC, or maybe they really can’t do anything.
And about rating, one of my friend too suffered from it. He even mailed to them and all they said was that they can’t do anything now.
Even the teams qualifying feel more pity for those who they thought otherwise would. Anyways what’s gone is begone. ACM India needs to learn to have a good problemset from next time.
3 Likes
just a small bug in 2nd implementation.started with 3rd early in the contest but left after some feedback
hmmm you are absolutely right.i think codeforces or kattis servers are good option for icpc online rounds,just cut the chef out
1 Like
completely agreed with you guys! really sad but will try next time (my last one)!
3 Likes
like the singapore icpc round held on kattis some days back
MY true feelings!
aptly said
so you expect people to dig up the problem in archives and then copy paste solutions
Team’s that didn’t get qualified even after solving the second problem are from colleges where there is a lot of competition. So even if there were more problems they might not have qualified still. Teams qualifying solving a single problem are from colleges with less involvement in cp. They would have qualified anyways with a lower score even if number of problems were more. So I don’t understand what is the problem?
5 Likes
Only because you couldn’t solve doesn’t make it idiotic, it makes it a good one. Instead you should have said it was a tough problemset, with only one cakewalk to boost up the confidence.
1 Like
This shows he has practised/participated more and that’s why will get qualified(if he was able to solve that) but not you. Just blaming others for your failures doesn’t help.
3 Likes
If you worked hard and didn’t qualify it’s really heartbreaking. But was that Codechef’s fault or yours. Maybe you followed a wrong strategy. Maybe you panicked. Either was wasn’t the fault yours? Not everyday is your day you see. Luck and Skills both matters. You were just unlucky, so instead of blaming codechef try harder for next year?
lets agree to disagree
1 Like
@soham1234 you seem to be pretty worried about rating.why you only gave long contests in starting and cookoffs later.
Cookoff and Lunchtime timings are mostly not in my favour, so I generally have to skip them. And not for my ratings. What would be worse, I would drop to 5* if i participate, i dont care and neither does any company.
ohh and you were asking me to participate in cookoff’s and ltime when you yourself haven’t…Hypocrisy.
“neither does any company.” ohh so you do it for job
But I didn’t make the mistake like you did, did I? Nor i blamed others for my failure.
Yes if it could be a good addition to CV then also it was okay to care for ratings but it’s not because they don’t even care whether you are a 5* or a 2*. And yes if that mattered I would have cared for my ratings too, because I don’t wanna be unemployed after i graduate. Wouldn’t you have done the same?