Yeah such a low frequency of rated short contests on CodeChef is definitely something that needs to be improved, anyways congrats for such a stellar performance, let’s hope it’s rated
mee too…i wish they don’t make the round unrated
Congrats Bro…
same bro!!
There is some technical issue which we are looking into. The ratings should be updated soon. Sorry for the delay!
Wow this reply make my day…
many of us wanted to be rated …now it’s officially confirmed . congrats to all for rating changes.
My rating is updated now.
At this moment I’m like
Lunchtime rating is increased 100 . So can i conclude that my overall rating will be increase by 100 or it’s depend on other parameters.? @admin
All ratings should be updated now. Sorry again for the delay!
Wasn’t there too much inflation of rating in this lunchtime?
What made you think that
Isn’t that a good thing?
Congrats👌
Yes, it always is. And congrats to all🙂
Thanks for that. But I’m still curious about what happend to GOLMINE. We haven’t recieved any update from the setter/editorialist. Can you please look into this? The editorial wasn’t clear. Please ask them to explain this nicely because the problem statement was pretty vague. While submitting, I expected a WA because I literally coded the problem in 5 minutes based on the sample test cases and completely ignored the word “optimal” which was a key part in this problem. To my surprise, I got 100 points. More precisely, please ask them to prove how working together will be optimal. A proof by contradiction will be best because that will eliminate all doubts regarding why they can’t work in different mines. I hope you look into this quick @admin and also improve the quality of problems (all were very nice except for this) and editorials. Thanks.
The tester’s comment resolves it almost fully: On the validity of CodeChef's GOLMINE problem - Codeforces
The contest admin will look into it and comment if they feel some further resolution is needed.