# LUNCHTIM - Editorial

**URL:** <https://discuss.codechef.com/t/lunchtim-editorial/87198>\
**Category:** editorial\
**Tags:** easy, editorial, stack, ltime94\
**Created:** [March 27, 2021, 1:21pm UTC](https://discuss.codechef.com/t/lunchtim-editorial/87198 "2021-03-27T13:21:14Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 29

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![suman\_18733097](https://discuss.codechef.com/user_avatar/discuss.codechef.com/suman_18733097/32/218666_2.png) [@suman\_18733097](https://discuss.codechef.com/u/suman_18733097)\
**Post date:** [March 28, 2021, 1:09pm UTC](https://discuss.codechef.com/t/lunchtim-editorial/87198/29 "2021-03-28T13:09:01Z")

</div>

I have checked if there is any kind of worst case input, as described above, present in test data using the following code.

```auto
for test in range(int(input())):
    n = int(input())
    l = list(map(int, input().split()))
    if len(set(l)) == 1 and n >= 2 * 10**4:
        raise ValueError("Worst case input")

```

I got WA instead of RTE. It is clear that such input doesn’t exist in test data.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discuss.codechef.com/t/lunchtim-editorial/87198)._