@shaily_adm
Kindly look into this matter. These type of activities demotivate genuine candidates and are against the very notion of Competetive Programming!!
For all those who got plagiarised in the previous contest and removed from the rank list, my rating never increased after that, a plag check is fine but one should get a rating according to the ranks which can be updated after the plag check.
Starters 28 Rank card should not be updated until the plagiarism check is complete, due to excessive cheating?
YES
NO
0voters
@shaily_adm
This is a joke that solutions are getting leaked and you all cant even give plagiarism
check stats of starters 24, 25 , 26… Its been over a month and no plagiarism check stats have been done or atleast updated to us
In today starters 28 the solution of C in division 2 was leaked and out of 900 submissions 800 are identical and they are same to same. But you all take eternity to punish these cheaters and would not update the ranks of the honest programmers
This is the exact solution leaked in telegram and over 800 of the submissions of them are exact or same to same and you all will take months to give us plagiarism updates, and after months when you all will give then those who cheated will be spared as they will obfuscate the code
#include<bits/stdc++.h>
using namespace std; #define endl “\n” #define int long long #define fori(n) for(int i=0;i<n;i++) #define forj(n) for(int j=1;j<=n;j++) #define debug(x) cout<<“error”<<x<<endl #define mod 1000000007
void solve() {
int n, m;
cin >> n >> m;
vector<vector> adj(n);
for (int i = 0; i < m; i++)
{
int x, y;
cin >> x >> y;
x–, y–;
adj[x].push_back(y);
adj[y].push_back(x);
}
vector vis(n, false);
dfs(0, vis, adj);
int count = 0;
while (!vis[n - 1])
{
vector vis2(n, false);
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++)
if (vis[i])
{
if (i + 1 < n)
dfs(i + 1, vis2, adj);
if (i - 1 >= 0)
dfs(i - 1, vis2, adj);
}
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++)
vis[i] = vis[i] || vis2[i];
count++;
}
cout << count << endl;
}
main()
{
ios_base::sync_with_stdio(false);
cin.tie(NULL);
int t; cin >> t;
while (t--) solve();
cerr << "time taken : " << (float)clock() / CLOCKS_PER_SEC << " secs" << endl;
Actually bro @admin and others are not interested in these matter , they only want participants no matter whether they are honest or cheaters , and over the time they will
get it but unfortunately the platform will loose all its authenticity. And I don’t know what kind of plaigirism checker was running in the previous contests , all the cheaters have their rating as it is.
@admin@aanu_2019 This contest should be unrated until they don’t punish the cheaters, oh my god all solutions are just exact in division 2 c. This platform will become a laughing stock if this continues.
And I am surprised I am the only one who is complaining about this cheating scandal and how they are let off
Yes bro I went through AC submissions list and literally almost every solution was same, the cheaters didn’t even bother to change their code even slightly, not even variables (some were stupid enough to retain comments as well). On every page of 25 submissions, only upto 3 were legit.
@shaily_adm
Not only the cheaters who submitted the copied code should be punished, but also the person who submitted it first as he is responsible for leaking of code and such a huge plagiarism taking place.
@shaily_adm@i_am_ris0 this contest should be unrated because even if you all punish these cheaters (a few of them) you all never update the rank cards, resulting in the loss of our ratings
There are way more than just these but it is useless they wont punish any of these cheaters as this is not Codeforces. CC stands for cheater cluster not code chef
The only possible reason for this is either the user has some connection with someone who has actually solved the problem and simply copied the results into the array or the test cases are being leaked by someone among the contest regulators.
@admin please ban these idiots. They have been cheating from a very long time. Due to the excessive cheating the popularity of codechef has significantly reduced!
