Ambiguous description of PREFPERM cook138

general
1

Really quite don’t understand why
this is judged WA, CodeChef: Practical coding for everyone
and this is AC CodeChef: Practical coding for everyone

first example
WA output: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
AC output: 3 2 1 6 5 4 7 8

AC one: i just think each time set the max as as first

2

The problem states that prefixes of only the given numbers must form a permutation.
In your case, it is given that only prefixes of size 3 6 7 8 form a permutation, but in WA there are multiple prefixes that are forming a permutation and don’t belong to 3 6 7 8.
For example, the prefix of size 4 should not form a permutation:
WA: 1 2 3 4 (it is a permutation)
AC: 3 2 1 6 (it is not a permutation)

3

thanks!