# CHEFHACK - Editorial

### SUGGESTION:

Before posting your question with asking for help try this test.
The answer should be 436746489.
If it is hard to debug this test for you, here is the helpful information.
It contains the number of unsuccessful tries for each cell
or -1 if the cell was hacked by the “Grid Hacking Mechanism”.
If it still hard to debug try another smaller test that contains answer and similar debug information as above.
If you pass this test then read carefully the bold tip in the QUICK EXPLANATION section.
If you follow this tip but still have WA then post your question and we will help you.

### PROBLEM LINK:

Author: Khadar Basha
Tester: Anton Lunyov
Editorialist: Anton Lunyov

EASY

### PROBLEM:

You are given N × N grid filled by non-negative integers. We single out 3 types of numbers on the grid: primes, even non-primes and odd non-primes. For each number we define the cost as follows: for the prime number it is the id of this prime in the 0-based list of all primes, for even non-prime number X it is X / 2, and for odd non-prime number Y it is (Y + 3) / 2 (the cost of a number is the shortcut for the number of unsuccessful tries to crack the server secured by the password equals to this number; the mentioned formulas for cost in all three cases are clear from the problem statement).

Two even non-prime numbers that share a side on the grid are connected to each other. The same is true for odd non-prime numbers. But prime number is not connected to any other number. In this way all cells of the grid form a bidirectional graph that has several connected components (each cell having prime number is a separate component). The cost of the component is defined as the cost of the first cell in this component that we meet traversing the grid in row-major order. Now your task is to find the sum of costs over all components.

### QUICK EXPLANATION:

Actually, most of the job has already made while we reformulated the problem above. Now you simply need to loop over all cells of the grid in row-major order and if we meet the unvisited cell we add its cost to the answer and run DFS from this cell in the graph constructed above to mark other cells of its connected component as visited.

Tip: the total cost could overflow 32-bit integer type. Use 64-bit type instead.

To be able to find the cost of the prime cell fast enough we need to run Sieve of Eratosthenes in advance (even before input the very first test) in order to find all prime numbers. Then we need to create the array of size 107 that contains for each prime its id. Now the cost of each number can be found in O(1).

The overall complexity is O(K * log log K + T * N * N).

### EXPLANATION:

As mentioned above at first we run Sieve of Eratosthenes to identify all prime numbers:

```isPrime[0] = false
isPrime[1] = false
for i = 2 to K do
isPrime[i] = true
for i = 2 to sqrt(K) do
if isPrime[i] then
for j = i * i to K with step i do
isPrime[j] = false
```

where K = 107 − 1.

Next we fill array of costs. We maintain variable `prime_id` which is equal to the number of primes we met so far:

```prime_id = 0
for i = 0 to K do
if isPrime[i] then
cost[i] = prime_id
prime_id = prime_id + 1
else
cost[i] = i div 2 + (i mod 2) * 2
```

Note the formula for the cost for non-prime number.

Now we can input grids and traverse them. We use two-dimensional array `A[][]` for the initial grid. Also we use another two-dimensional array `visited[][]` to check visited cells, which could be filled by `false` while input the grid:

```for i = 1 to N do
for j = 1 to N do
read A[i][j]
visited[i][j] = false
```

Now we can traverse the grid. If we meet visited cell we skip it. Otherwise we always add its cost to the answer and if it is non-prime then run DFS to fill its connected component:

```total_cost = 0 // this should be a variable of 64-bit integer type!
for i = 1 to N do
for j = 1 to N do
if (visited[i][j]) then
continue
total_cost = total_cost + cost[A[i][j]]
if (not isPrime[A[i][j]]) then
DFS(i, j)
```

DFS(i, j) is the recursive routine that traverse the grid passing from the cell (i, j) to its neighbors in the graph constructed above:

```DSF(i, j)
if (not visited[i][j]) then
visited[i][j] = true
for (x, y) in {(i+1, j), (i-1, j), (i, j-1), (i, j+1)} do
if (not isPrime[A[x][y]]) and (A[x][y] is of the same parity as A[i][j]) then
DFS(x, y)
```

Note that we pass to the cell (x, y) only if the number in it is non-prime and of the same parity as in the cell (i, j). Missing of any of these checks will definitely lead to WA. Also see tester’s solution as a reference to one of the convenient ways how to implement loop:

```        for (x, y) in {(i+1, j), (i-1, j), (i, j-1), (i, j+1)} do
```

### ALTERNATIVE SOLUTION:

For some languages (like Java or Python) the recursive implementation of DFS could lead to runtime error due to stack overflow. In this case you need to implement either non-recursive DFS or BFS (breadth-first search) to mark cells of each connected component. Another alternative is to use disjoint-set data structure to do the same job. But this way requires some additional thinking.

The alternative very fast method to find all primes is to use Atkin Sieve invented in 2004 by Atkin and Bernstein. It allows to find all primes up to K using O(K / log log K) operations. Check it out first 6 related problems to train yourself at fast implementation of sieve.

The remaining 3 problems involves flood fill algorithm.

### AUTHOR’S AND TESTER’S SOLUTIONS:

Author’s solution can be found here.
Tester’s solution can be found here.

### RELATED PROBLEMS:

13 Likes

Can you that what is my problem ID is :1681905

The editorial is pretty nice.
I wonder what was wrong with my implementation.
Can you please have a look and let me know my error. It would be great. I’m unable to figure out.

http://www.codechef.com/viewsolution/1718060

Nice editorial.
I have an unrelated question though. I used BFS instead of DFS. Everything else was same as you suggested in your editorial. But I was getting Wrong answer somehow.
I tried it with many test cases generated by hand and it was working fine. How should I approach in finding problems in my code in such scenarios.
Any help will be highly appreciated.

BTW, my problem submission was
http://www.codechef.com/viewsolution/1720890

If anyone can point to what test cases my program was failing, it will be really helpful.
Thanks in advance.

only mistake was… i used 32bit integer for total cost instead of 64
feels like kill-me-now

7 Likes

I first used an integer array of size 10e7 for the sieve, but it ran out of memory though…had to half the size of the array and cancel all the even numbers.

What is problem in my solution…
I am getting WA
http://www.codechef.com/viewsolution/1723138

To implement grid hacking in java, if i use an ArrayDeque or a LinkedList, i get TLE( CodeChef: Practical coding for everyone ), while if i change the data structure to ArrayList( CodeChef: Practical coding for everyone ), i get one of the fastest execution times in java. Any reason as to why this is happening?

Thanks for such a detailed editorial. I learnt a lot. But still my program is not getting submitted. If I am not asking too much, can I get a sample test case for which my code is failing. My submission id is 1724659. Thanks.

I had the same solution in Java (except I used the Sieve of Atkin and instead of a boolean[][] I changed the original input array directly), but I kept getting WA :/.

Can somebody check my solution to see what’s wrong? I tried several test cases, but all of them printed out the right answer…

http://www.codechef.com/viewsolution/1715077

Hi,

Actually i did the same solution described above in Python but it didn’t work (i got Time Limit Exceeded), you can check my attempt here and here.

But actually, i was able to find another algorithm for this problem that got accepted, the idea was that i only check for immediate neighbors of any server to know if it should be included or not, of course this may lead to count a server while it shouldn’t (i.e. it should have been already cracked), but to be aware of this case i created a Python dictionary that hold information about which server cracked which one (`cracked_by`) and then each time i visit a server i check if i should update the `cracked_by` of the immediate neighbors to know if i added wrongly a server if yes i discard the value from the result.

You can check my solution here, feel free to post any feedback.

HTH,

1 Like

I got AC after using Sieve of Eratosthenes but I want to implement it by another method by which I couldn’t. We can find all prime numbers less than 10^7 by simply making another prime number program and copy the output and assign it to array in our program arr[]={all prime numbers less than 10^7 that we already have.}. Now just apply a for loop
for(i=0;i<arr.size;i++)
arr1[arr[i]]=i;
now just find if any number is a prime by
if(arr1[num]!=0)
return arr1[num];

but In the above approach I couldn’t assign the whole set of prime numbers to arr[] manually by copy paste. I am getting error “/usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.3.2/…/…/…/…/lib/crt1.o: In function `_start': /home/aurel32/tmp/glibc/glibc-2.9/csu/../sysdeps/i386/elf/start.S:115: undefined reference to`main’ collect2: ld returned 1 exit status” when I am submitting my code.

Can the admins tell what’s wrong with CodeChef: Practical coding for everyone?

In other note :- The tester solution is not getting complied on gcc. Need to include stdio.h.

I’m getting WA my solution is this http://www.codechef.com/viewsolution/1742829.

The test data, http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=j6UWCAZ5
is too large for me to debug the program, so I am unable to find why is it giving 421211088 instead of correct result. Can you please help.
My solution is CodeChef: Practical coding for everyone

i have checked all the test cases which u have provided in the editorial and it gives right answer.I am unable to figure out the problem. CodeChef: Practical coding for everyone

I habe a problem in my solution http://www.codechef.com/viewsolution/1745646 based on the editorial which seems to be more a compiler/c++ problem then an algorithmic problem.
I got the error “Access violation reading location 0x01A4B7A4” when trying to read from my big prime array. Can anyone help?

Please have a look at the following solution :

http://www.codechef.com/viewsolution/1746818

It gave correct results for the test cases mentioned in the editorial here, those in the problem statement and some cases generated by myself. But still it displays ‘Wrong Result’ here.

Please help!

Can you please tell whats wrong with my code…its giving correct output for test cases…

http://www.codechef.com/viewsolution/1752815

my

``````
[1]  is giving a runtime error(NZEC).Can anyone plz tell what is the problem?

[1]: http://www.codechef.com/viewsolution/1790006``````