CK87MEAD - Editorial

centroid-decomp
ck87mead
cook87
editorial
fenwick-tree
line-sweep
medium-hard
mhammad1

#1

Problem Link:

Practice
Contest

Author: Mohammad Shahhoud & Said Sryhini
Tester: Hasan Jadouh
Editorialist: Mohammad Shahhoud

Difficulty:

Medium-Hard

Prerequisites :

Centroid Decomposition, Sweep Line, Binary Indexed Tree, Simple Math.

Problem:

Given a tree, each node i has value A_i, find the number of node pairs(u,v) such that the median of values in the path from u to v (inclusive) is at most X and the mean is at least Y.

Explanation:

The current described solution based on the setter solution, so you can check the setter solution for the implementation.

We will discuss many solutions that are going to lead us to the correct fast solution.

##Slow solution:

Suppose we will loop on each pair of nodes (u) and (v), so now we have the end nodes fixed, we can do DFS from the starting node and get all the nodes in the path from (u) to (v) and put them into array, sort the array and get the mean and median, so the time complexity of this solution will be: O(N^3.Log(N)) which actually doesn’t fit in the time limit.

##Better solution:

We can actually do an optimization for the previous code by writing some math equations:

Let A_i be the value of node i, so if we create two arrays called medianValue and meanValue of length N where:

medianValue* = (A* <= X) ? +1 : -1
meanValue* = A* - Y

The medianValue of node i is +1 if the node value is less or equal to X and -1 otherwise, and the meanValue is A* - Y, but what’s the point of creating those two arrays?

To check the median condition of the array, we can simply sum the values of the node values on the path from (u) to (v) and let’s call this value sumMedian, so if the sumMedian value is greater or equal to zero, that means the number of values less than or equal to X are greater than or equal to the number of values greater than X, so the median is a number less than or equal to X. To check the mean condition we can write these equations:

\sum_{i = 1}^{N}A* / N \ge Y ==> \sum_{i = 1}^{N}A*\ge Y * N ==> \sum_{i = 1}^{N}A* - Y * N \ge 0 ==> \sum_{i = 1}^{N}(A*-Y) >= 0 ==> \sum_{i = 1}^{N}meanValue* >= 0

So the problem conditions are correct if: sumMedian \ge 0 and sumMean \ge 0

Now after all that, we can do DFS from each node i passing the sum of meanValue and medianValue, checking of the sumMedian and sumMean, we can get a solution of complexity: O(N^2).

##Intended Solution:

We will call a pair (u,v) is good if the conditions of median and mean hold.
For better solution, we can do centroid decomposition for the tree.

##What is Centroid Decomposition?

It’s a technique used for dividing the tree into trees, each new tree has size at most N/2, and the node that divides the tree called centroid, calculating the number of good-pairs passing through this centroid, then call the same procedure on the new trees. you can read more about centroid decomposition from: Quora Thread .

![tree][8]

Now let’s for simplicity consider a binary tree case, in the previous picture, the centroid divides the tree to two trees, but how can we get the number of good-pairs passing through the centroid?

By doing DFS from the centroid, we can get for each node the value sumMean and sumMedian, where sumMean* is the sum of meanValue* from the centroid to node i (without centroid value), and sumMedian* is the sum of medianValue* from the centroid to node i (without centroid value), now we have to find:
sumMedian + sumMedian[v] + medianValue[centroid] \ge 0 ==> sumMedian \ge -sumMedian[v] - medianValue[centroid]

and

sumMean + sumMean[v] + meanValue[centroid] \ge 0 ==> sumMean \ge -sumMean[v] - meanValue[centroid]

where (u) is a node from tree1 and (v) is a node from tree2

Let’s consider (sumMean, sumMedian) as a point in 2D Cartisian Plane, so for each node (v) from tree2 we have to find the number of points from tree1 in the rectangle that its bottom-left corner is (-sumMean[v]-meanValue[centroid], -sumMedian[v]-medianValue[centroid]) and its upper-right corner is (Infinity, Infinity) and to solve this efficiently, we can do it using sweep line and Binary Indexed Tree.

##Sweep Line:

First we have to convert the 2D problem to 1D problem for easier and more efficient solution, and we can do that by sorting all points by their X values.
Second, we note that each point has two events:

  1. Add event: we add the point to the BIT… The add event at point(sumMean[v])
  2. Query event: we query to get the number of good points with the current point… The query event at point(-sumMean[v] - meanValue[centroid]).

So each point v has two events, and each event has (type, mean, median, index) where type is the type of the event, mean is sumMean[v] for add events and (-sumMean[v] - meanValue[centroid]) for query events, median is sumMedian[v] for add events and (-sumMedian[v] - medianValue[centroid]) for query events, index is the index of the owner point of the event.

After that, we add all 2N events into array, sort them by their mean value and we add all the median values into the BIT.

Loop from left to right on events, if the current event type is update, we remove the median value from the BIT, and if the current event type is query, we query on the BIT to find the good points with this point, the query interval is [Event.median, Infinity].

Important: Note that for query events, all meanValue that are less than the event mean value have removed, and all meanValue that are greater than or equal to the event mean value are still exist in the BIT, so the mean constraint is always true for each query event.

There is a case when some point u add point v to the answer and v add point u to the answer (so here we count the same pair twise), so we can handle this case by removing the point from BIT when we query it.

There is a problem in this solution; we said before that we want to find the number of paths passing through the centroid, but here we counted also the paths that don’t, so we call the same above procedure for each resulting tree to remove those paths from the answer.

The time complexity of this solution:

The levels of centroid tree is at most Log(N) levels (each time we get the half size of the tree).

On each level we loop through all the nodes, calculate the 2N events and sort them with complexity O(N.Log(N))

Last step, we loop on all events, add N points and remove N points , query N points, each (add, remove, query) operation is Log(N), so the complexity is: N.Log(N)

The total complexity: O(N.Log(N).Log(N))

Solution 1
Solution 2


#2

The feeling when codechef marks problem solved by 4 people medium-hard…


#3

And a problem solved by 1000+ people as “MEDIUM”. (Referrig to this long contest)


#4

You think it is too low or too high? :slight_smile: There were actually not so many strong contestants in this contest, and I can say how it sounded from my perspective - both 4th and 5th problem are kinda obvious in terms of solution, but I decided to not even start coding it, being a bit disappointed with that problemset, like “Oh, that’s boring and with no idea at all; I already had one such task today, that’s enough. Either I’ll get AC on it with no positive emotions or I’ll get stuck on debugging some part which will be even worse. Nah, I have better things to do.”


#5

Regarding strength of contestants - looking at first several pages of standings, I’d say that 15th strongest contestant in September would be around top8 in terms of strength this month.

And regarding creativity - I got much, much better impression about September Cook-Off, for me it required much more creativity while still having some coding there as well. Well, that’s just a matter of taste, so it’s not setters fault that their problems didn’t match my tastes :slight_smile:


#6

I don’t think there are many contestants who handled it the way I did - since now I’m taking contests even less seriously than I did when I was doing competitive programming as my main activity. But definitely there are some guys who tried it and simply didn’t manage to debug it. So in terms of difficulty of the problem itself - I’d say this one is definitely not so hard/tricky; when you can say your ICPC team main coder to implement it and switch to solving other tasks by yourself:) In terms of coding - yep, this one may be unpleasant, in case you are not very good with such stuff.