 # NAME2 - Editorial

CAKEWALK

### PROBLEM

Given two strings, say A and B, find whether A is a sub-sequence of B, or whether B is a sub-sequence of A.

A sub-sequence is defined as a string obtained from another string, say S, by deleting one or more characters form S, and not changing the order of the remaining characters.

### QUICK EXPLANATION

If the length of A is more than the length of B, then A cannot be a sub-sequence of B. This is obvious because you cannot delete characters from B and end up with a string that has more characters than it did orginally.

Thus, if length of A is larger than length of B we can swap them. Now, it only needs to be checked whether A is a sub-sequence of B.

### EXPLANATION

Checking whether A is a sub-sequence of B can be done greedily.

Let us find the first occurence of the first character of A in B.

```for i = 1 to B.length
if B* == A
break
i++
```

If we find that i is larger than B.length, then of course the very first character of A doesn’t exist in B. This would mean that it is impossible for A to be a sub-sequence of B.

On the other hand, we have found that the the first character of A occurs in B at position i, first. Now, we can start looking for the second character of A. But, any occurance of the second character of A that occurs before i in B is irrelevant because we cannot perform any operation that changes the order of characters in A (or B for that matter).

Thus, we can resume searching for the second character of A in B, after position i.

```for j = i+1 to B.length
if B[j] == A
break
j++
```

Using the same arguments as above, if j is not more than B.length, we have to resume searching for the third character of A in B, after position j.

When we have found all the characters of A in B, we can safely end the algorithm as well (with a positive). Otherwise we will run out of characters in B and we must return with a negative.

The above algorithm will look like the following pseudo code.

```j = 1

for i = 1 to A.length
while j < B.length
if B[j] == A*
break
j++
if j > B.length
return false
i++
j++

return true
```

The complexity of the algorithm is O(|A| + |B|), where |S| is the length of S. If it is not obvious to you why the algorithm isn’t O(|A| * |B|) note that we never decrement the value of j. In every iteration of the above algorithm we always increment i as well as j, and probably increment j more so. Thus, the algorithm must terminate in at most O(|A|) iterations of the outer loop and not more than O(|B|) iterations of the inner loop.

Note how this problem differs from the standard Dynamic Programming problem of finding the largest common sub-sequence between two strings. We could of course solve this problem by finding the longest commong sub-sequence between A and B as well, but doing so requires O(|A| * |B|) which is too slow for the limits set for length of the strings A and B.

### SETTER’S SOLUTION

Setter’s solution will be updated soon.

### TESTER’S SOLUTION

Can be found here.

2 Likes

Can you provide me a link to learn more about dynamic programming to find largest common sub- sequence between 2 strings.

Thank you so much plzz check my solution

Can anyone help me out with what’s wrong in my code ? can you verify my code here

https://www.codechef.com/viewsolution/13395479
what is wrong with the above code ?

Sorry the solution links are broken. Will be fixing them shortly!

https://www.codechef.com/viewsolution/24846465