I did say “partially”
Before the editorial:
- Successful submissions: 205
- Accuracy: 20%
After the editorial:
- Successful submissions: 205
- Accuracy: 0.9%
You are a great motivator!
Wait is this legit?
there’s a not null probability that it’s legit! … just joking.
Initially it was 1025 then. 21000 more submissions seems fishy, that would imply an average of 28 attempts per person at best.
The 0.9 accuracy is real…of course I have no idea the numbers before
<3 thanks for helping in this problem <3 <3
Till now 774 + me(I am not participating) people have seen the video. I guess you should close it @tmwilliamlin. By the way, the editorial was awesome. I expect these video editorials from you from now onwards. Keep it up! A nice algorithm, and explained very will how to use it.
This should have been preserved for next month
I remember someone pulling the exact same prank on CF. Even the video link is same.
0/10, will let MOSS admin know of your plagiarism.
969 frustated clicks!!!
Bang on ! It’s 1.0k clicks now
Ironically, this guy’s bio says
“Success is knowing when to give up”
@tmwilliamlin That channel of youtube got 1204+ extra views for you.
The number of click in this link is increasing like corona virus victim!
Hey everyone, there is a major hint for solution present in the video at 1:04.