@lucas_dijk is definitely a fake account. In a long discussion on him & not a single statement from that side.
@admin please restore the top contributor’s list before the creation of @lucas_dijk, I’ll not be in the list but those will be the real top contributors.
Agree… It’s high time we come with new ways to corner this issues.
I too have been suggesting something similar to them via mail.
No response whatsoever 
My idea was that if @admins are too busy (due to snackdown etc), some trusted member could be temporarily given privileges to close thread etc. and maintain discuss. Whether that user gets privileges to maintain karma system is upto them (i suggested privileges like “Penalty of upto 50 karma” [user can mail admins to revert that decision, if he feels the member is not being just.]). Atleast if an active guy is there to close duplicate questions, take quick action &etc. then the quality of discuss would be twice as good as current.
Codechef has this kind of feature, back in the past I saw a username and it was suspended by another guy with high reputation. The link is lost I’ll try to find that.
@only4 Please provide the link if you find it and if there is such a feature then all the users should be made aware about it.
I’ll try to find.
People with high karma can close others post (as shown here The new Karma system | CodeChef )
Also, i found this line in the end-
"We invite all the superusers as well as regular contributors to comment on the changes and "
Superusers? I dont think he was referring to @admin there. @only4 might be correct.
Should I start a new thread about it?
Yes, i feel its a different issue than what this thread deals with.
@only4 that’s a great spirit and generosity but I think u will be there as rohit_jere_rj and marshal_roxx will be removed.
Thats why i mentioned, atleast 1 admin is required to monitor list in final few hours.
Yes, and I think people like you who have so much karma should be able to strike off names on karma farming as @qruiger_116 said.
@abdullah768 if u search ‘karma’ in the forum, then u will see about 15-20 of such discussions.
200 laddus? Isn’t it 300?
Edited it.
hey @mathecodician … i have said you earlier and even now that i seriously have nothing to do with all this … so you shouldn’t be taking my name on public forum … Regarding yesterday’s series of events by a fake account , i am very much in favour of restoration of the contributor’s list before his actions .
I doubt will rohitjereji be able to solve even ome question himself… leave 660
Admin will decide that.